Reference file

benchmarks.md

benchmarks-md.md

B2B SaaS LinkedIn Ads Benchmarks

CTR Benchmarks by Funnel Stage

IMPORTANT: CTR terminology varies by campaign objective. For Engagement objective campaigns (including TLAs), LinkedIn's "CTR" metric is actually engagement rate (reactions, comments, post clicks) not click-through-rate to landing page. CTRTLP (CTR to landing page) is the real CTR to off-platform destinations. The benchmarks below (0.30%-1.30%) apply to CTRTLP, not to the "CTR" column reported for Engagement campaigns.

Audience Type CTRTLP Range Notes
Cold (TOF) 0.30% - 0.55% Anything above 0.44% is above platform average. For Engagement campaigns, compare engagement rate, not post CTR
Warm / Retargeting (MOF) 0.55% - 0.80% Higher because audience already knows you
Engaged / Converted (BOF) 0.80% - 1.30% Highest intent, highest CTR to landing page

Reality check: 0.45% is the overall LinkedIn Ads average CTRTLP. Anything above 1% is genuinely good. Above 1.5% for Sponsored Content is strong. Message Ads should target >1.5% CTRTLP.

CPM and CPC Benchmarks

Metric Range
CPM (avg) $33 - $65
CPC (standard brand ads) $8 - $22+
CPC (TLAs) $4.14 (can go as low as)
CPM (Spotlight Ads) ~$5.23 (74% lower than single image)
Conversation Ads CTR 1% - 5% (CTA clicks / sends)

Cost Per Conversion / Lead Benchmarks

Metric Range Notes
Cost per engagement $2 - $5 Below $3 is strong
Cost per conversion (on-platform) $15 - $50 Varies heavily by industry and offer
Cost per lead (Lead Gen Form) $50 - $200 Depends on offer value and audience
Cost per form submission (website) $200 - $500 Higher friction than native forms
SQL cost Should not exceed $500 Varies by ACV

Form Fill Rate

  • Target: above 8%
  • Below 8% = form is too long, offer isn't compelling enough, or audience isn't warm enough

TLA-Specific Benchmarks

Metric TLA Performance Standard Ad Performance
CTR 1.7x higher Baseline
Engagement rate 1.6x higher Baseline
CPC As low as $4.14 $8-$22+
Company page ads comparison 3-6x higher CTR Baseline

Why TLAs win: Ads from real executives feel organic in the feed. They build trust. They don't look like ads. LinkedIn's algorithm favors them because they drive genuine engagement.

Ad Format Performance Ranking

Rank Format Best For Cost Efficiency
1 Thought Leader Ads (TLA) TOF engagement + BOF conversion Highest - lowest CPC, highest CTR
2 Video TLAs (VTLA) TOF awareness + retargeting pool High - strong conversion rates
3 Video Ads (10-30s) TOF awareness Good for retargeting pool building
4 Document Ads MOF nurture High engagement, good for retargeting
5 Single Image All stages Versatile, moderate performance
6 Carousel MOF/BOF Good for feature showcases
7 Spotlight Ads MOF reinforcement Very cheap CPM (~$5.23)
8 Text Ads MOF brand reinforcement Cheapest, always-on
9 Lead Gen Forms BOF conversion Lower friction, higher completion
10 Conversation Ads MOF/BOF 1-5% CTR, new retargeting options
11 CTV/Brand Awareness Not recommended at < $15K/mo Too expensive for small budgets

ROAS Benchmarks

  • B2B SaaS average ROAS on LinkedIn: ~113%
  • This is a lagging metric - LinkedIn Ads impact is often seen 3-6 months after engagement
  • Pipeline attribution is more meaningful than last-click ROAS for LinkedIn

Key Ratios to Monitor

Ratio What It Tells You
Engagement rate > 1% Creative resonates
Landing page CTR / Total CTR How many engagers actually visit your site (often shockingly low)
Video view rate (starts/impr) > 40% Creative hooks attention (horizontal 16:9)
Video completion rate (completions/starts) 8-15% Content holds attention (horizontal 16:9). Sub-3% for vertical
Cost per 50% view < $4 Video cost efficiency. $2-4 avg, $0.21 best case
Retargeting pool growth rate TOF is doing its job
BOF conversion rate > 5% Retargeting audience is warm enough

Industry Context

These benchmarks are for B2B SaaS. Adjust expectations for:

  • Enterprise / high ACV: Higher CPLs are acceptable ($300-$500+) because deal sizes justify it
  • SMB / low ACV: Need cheaper CPLs ($50-$150) to make unit economics work
  • Healthcare vertical: Often higher CPMs due to smaller, specialized audiences
  • Tech vertical: More competitive, benchmark CPCs tend to be at the higher end

By Ivan Falco - Frontal

benchmarks.md - LinkedIn Ads for B2B - GTM Skills